The government's shock therapy attack on the schools system has continued to feature in the
national press. A succession of stories have highlighted the nakedly
ideological nature of the government’s programme and the risks involved in
creating supposedly autonomous schools. Firstly, the New
Statesman carried a story about the fate of the Sulivan primary school in
Hammersmith and Fulham within the top 2% of schools in the country, which faces
closure to make way for a Church of England Free School with close connections
in the local Tory-run council.
Hot on the heels of the police getting involved in the
King’s Science Academy investigation in Bradford, comes the news that an Academy
school in County Durham is under investigation in connection with the
disappearance of £162,000 of academy resources. As the ever excellent Janet
Downs at the Local Schools Network points out, this sort of thing is more
likely to happen in academies and Free Schools because they are less publicly
accountable for the money they spend than community schools.
Last week also saw news that United Learning Trust who want
to open a primary Free School in Waltham Forest, are trying
to cut 30 jobs at their Salford City Academy. The suspicion is that this is
part of moves by academy chains to use their freedoms to alter the pay rates
and terms and conditions of their staff to cut costs.
Another example of this can be seen in the recent decision
of the AET
academies chain to privatise its entire support staff across its chain of
79 schools. As education expert Laura
McInerny noted in last week’s Guardian, this exercise, undertaken in the
name of ‘efficiency’ also enables them to create bigger surpluses (they can’t
legally create profits or pay dividends at the moment) which can be used to pay
obscene executive salaries, and, presumably certain other management
charges.
But perhaps the biggest news of the week and the most
damning for the government’s programme to smash up the comprehensive community
school sector, was the revelation that a
major academy chain was to be stripped of 10 of its schools. E-Act is one
of the biggest academy chains in the country and until today ran 34 academies.
Last year it ran into trouble when it was accused of paying lavish expenses to
its board and the Education Funding Agency raised concerns about its financial
management. Now, following a number of problematic Ofsted reviews, E-Act is to
hand 10 schools back to the government. The Department for Education will
presumably try to find another academy sponsor, but this decision shows how
chaotic a marketised education system dominated by chains like Oasis and
Tauheedul will be. Chains are currently being inadequately monitored, as the
Labour Party has argued. But even if problems are exposed in chains, rather
than schools working collaboratively in their communities to raise standards,
the chains and the DfE will simply look to ‘re-tender’ the management of the
schools. The chains won’t want their overall results dragged down by difficult
schools and the government will want to hand them to someone else to fix as
soon as possible. All of which spells chaos for children, parents and teachers.